Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On

Large companies driving job growth in Canada amid recession fears: report

November 14, 2025

$100,000: Biotech firm loses big in wrongful dismissal case

November 14, 2025

Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 5 workers guilty of sexual harassment

November 14, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » Pita Pit Faces EEOC Lawsuit for Alleged Pregnancy Discrimination
Law

Pita Pit Faces EEOC Lawsuit for Alleged Pregnancy Discrimination

staffBy staffJuly 5, 20253 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently sued QSR Pita USA, Inc., which owns the Pita Pit restaurant franchise for alleged sex and disability discrimination. According to the lawsuit, a Pita Pit worker in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, was fired for asking to work from home to accommodate pregnancy-related nausea. According to the EEOC compliant, her pregnancy was called a “distraction” by management.

In its press release about Pita Pit, the EEOC also highlighted other pregnancy-related cases alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII. EEOC alleged sex discrimination in violate of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Prior to the work-from-home request, the employee had allegedly worked from home and hadn’t received any negative feedback about her performance.

Earlier this year, a Texas bar was ordered to pay $42,000 in relief to a fired bartender who allegedly faced pregnancy discrimination. Similarly, an assisted living facility in Minnesota agreed to pay $73,000 in relief after a manager discovered an employee’s pregnancy and allegedly launched a retaliation campaign.

EEOC pregnancy discrimination lawsuit

EEOC alleged sex discrimination in violate of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

EEOC Charges: Alleged Pregnancy Discrimination at Pita Pit

The EEOC alleges that Pita Pit’s actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits sex discrimination, including pregnancy-based discrimination, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which mandates reasonable accommodations for pregnancy-related conditions. The employee’s request to work from home was reportedly denied, and her subsequent termination has sparked scrutiny of the company’s practices. The lawsuit also names Pita Pit’s shareholders and successor, BubbaMax LLC, signaling that corporate restructuring cannot shield employers from liability.

This case aligns with the EEOC’s heightened focus on enforcing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), enacted in 2023 to ensure reasonable accommodations for pregnancy-related needs. The PWFA explicitly prohibits forcing employees onto leave when other accommodations, such as remote work or modified duties, are feasible. The Pita Pit case illustrates a potential violation of this mandate, as the employee’s request was allegedly dismissed without consideration. HR professionals must note that the PWFA applies to employers with 15 or more employees, making compliance a priority across industries.

The broader implications of this lawsuit are significant for HR leaders. Pregnancy discrimination remains a persistent issue, with the EEOC reporting numerous charges annually. Cases like Pita Pit’s highlight the need for robust policies that address accommodation requests promptly and fairly. HR teams should train managers to avoid stigmatizing language, such as calling a pregnancy a “distraction,” which can escalate legal risks. Moreover, fostering a culture of inclusion ensures that pregnant employees feel supported rather than marginalized.

Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Accommodation Mandates

To mitigate risks, HR departments should review their accommodation processes, ensuring they align with federal laws like the PWFA, Title VII, and the ADA. Clear documentation of accommodation requests and decisions is essential to demonstrate compliance. Additionally, employers must recognize that liability extends beyond the corporate entity, as individual owners or successors may be held accountable, as seen in the Pita Pit case.

The Pita Pit lawsuit serves as a wake-up call for organizations to prioritize employee rights and HR compliance. By proactively addressing pregnancy discrimination and fostering equitable workplaces, companies can avoid costly litigation and build trust with their workforce. As the EEOC continues to champion pregnant workers’ rights, HR leaders must lead the charge in creating fair, inclusive environments.

Subscribe to The HR Digest for the latest HR news and employment updates.

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

Boeing Defense Workers Ratify New Contract

November 14, 2025 Law

Verizon Layoffs Set to Target 15,000 Jobs as Agility and Efficiency Lead the Way

November 14, 2025 Law

Walgreens Eliminates Paid Holiday Benefit for Its Hourly Workers

November 13, 2025 Law

Paramount’s Five-Day RTO Mandate Saw 600 Employees Accept a Voluntary Buyout

November 12, 2025 Law

Rumors of Verizon’s Store Closures and Layoffs Have Employees Worried

November 10, 2025 Law

Square Enix Announces Layoffs, Shifting the Blame Away From AI Ambitions

November 8, 2025 Law
Top Articles

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 2024101 Views

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 202595 Views

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202495 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News

Local Threads Brings High-Quality Merch to Small Businesses Without the Usual Hassle

staffNovember 14, 2025

Verizon Layoffs Set to Target 15,000 Jobs as Agility and Efficiency Lead the Way

staffNovember 14, 2025

Ontario Court awards $5 million in whistleblower case

staffNovember 13, 2025
Most Popular

Large companies driving job growth in Canada amid recession fears: report

November 14, 20253 Views

$100,000: Biotech firm loses big in wrongful dismissal case

November 14, 20252 Views

Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 5 workers guilty of sexual harassment

November 14, 20252 Views
Our Picks

Local Threads Brings High-Quality Merch to Small Businesses Without the Usual Hassle

November 14, 2025

Verizon Layoffs Set to Target 15,000 Jobs as Agility and Efficiency Lead the Way

November 14, 2025

Ontario Court awards $5 million in whistleblower case

November 13, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.