Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On

Pita Pit Faces EEOC Lawsuit for Alleged Pregnancy Discrimination

July 5, 2025

Nearly 9 in 10 small businesses in Canada feeling more positive about future of business: report

July 4, 2025

Subscriber exclusive: Winners of Readers’ Choice Awards for 2025

July 4, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » A federal judge has nixed the NLRB’s proposed new joint-employer rule — The Employer Handbook Blog — March 11, 2024
Benfits

A federal judge has nixed the NLRB’s proposed new joint-employer rule — The Employer Handbook Blog — March 11, 2024

staffBy staffMarch 11, 20243 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

On Friday evening, a Texas federal judge blocked a proposed National Labor Relations Board rule that would have made it much easier for employees to unionize when he determined that enforcing the Board’s proposed joint employer rule “would be contrary to the law” and “arbitrary and capricious.”

I’ll give you a little refresher on the Board’s proposal. Then, we’ll examine where it fell apart.

What does the final rule say?

Back in October, the Board published a final rule which established that it would consider two or more entities to be joint employers of a group of employees if each entity has an employment relationship with the employees and if the entities share or codetermine one or more of the employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment. The mere authority to control essential terms and conditions of employment, even if never exercised or just indirectly, would be enough to establish a joint-employer relationship.

This would tend to come up in franchise and temporary staffing settings.

Why is the final rule contrary to the law?

The Board intended a two-step process: first, an entity must “qualify as a common-law employer of the disputed employees,” and second, “only if the entity is a common-law employer, then it must also have control over one or more essential terms and conditions of employment.”

The problem with that analysis, the court reasoned, is that “the second test is always met if the first test is met, so the Rule’s joint-employer inquiry has just one step for all practical purposes.”

At oral argument, the Board could not provide the court with an example of when the two-step test needed the second step.

Additionally, the court concluded that the rule was poorly drafted because the mere authority to control terms and conditions of employment (even if never exercised) or exercising the power to control indirectly would establish a joint-employer relationship “without any need to additionally demonstrate an employment relationship under the common law of agency.”

Allowing the Board proposal to stand would “treat virtually every entity that contracts for labor as a joint employer because virtually every contract for third-party labor has terms that impact, at least indirectly, at least one of the specified essential terms and conditions of employment.”

Why is the final rule “arbitrary and capricious”?

The court reasoned that it “fail[ed] to achieve the purpose that justified the rulemaking—establishing ‘a definite, readily available standard’ that will ‘assist employers and labor organizations in complying with the Act’ and ‘reduce uncertainty and litigation over the basic parameters of joint-employer status.’”

In other words, the Board’s proposed rule was clear as mud.

The Board has yet to decide whether it will appeal.

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

The Truth About Group Medicare: Better Benefits, Lower Cost

July 4, 2025 Benfits

Cross-Training Employees To Support Scheduled Maintenance Efforts

July 4, 2025 Benfits

What Is Global Human Resource Management (GHRM)?

July 3, 2025 Benfits

AI agent adoption is lagging. Experts explain what HR can do

July 3, 2025 Benfits

A Look at the Future of Hiring

July 2, 2025 Benfits

Record high reached for workplace discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims

July 2, 2025 Benfits
Top Articles

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 202498 Views

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202492 Views

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 202591 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News

Cross-Training Employees To Support Scheduled Maintenance Efforts

staffJuly 4, 2025

UPS Offers Voluntary Buyout Packages, but Teamsters Resist the Deal

staffJuly 4, 2025

Tenon Group appoints Amit Srivastava as Group Head – Human Resources —

staffJuly 4, 2025
Most Popular

Pita Pit Faces EEOC Lawsuit for Alleged Pregnancy Discrimination

July 5, 20250 Views

Nearly 9 in 10 small businesses in Canada feeling more positive about future of business: report

July 4, 20250 Views

Subscriber exclusive: Winners of Readers’ Choice Awards for 2025

July 4, 20250 Views
Our Picks

Cross-Training Employees To Support Scheduled Maintenance Efforts

July 4, 2025

UPS Offers Voluntary Buyout Packages, but Teamsters Resist the Deal

July 4, 2025

Tenon Group appoints Amit Srivastava as Group Head – Human Resources —

July 4, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.