Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On

In a shifting legal landscape, one document may save employers thousands

July 15, 2025

Strategic HR, June Edition: In Canada’s knowledge economy, YOY wage growth returns, but gender gaps

July 15, 2025

‘We do our best work when we’re together’: Starbucks doubles down on in-office work

July 15, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » Amazon faces lawsuit over alleged denial of leave for ectopic pregnancy
Law

Amazon faces lawsuit over alleged denial of leave for ectopic pregnancy

staffBy staffJune 4, 20254 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

Amazon faces a lawsuit alleging violations of the PWFA, ADA and FMLA after denying leave for an ectopic pregnancy and firing the employee. The lawsuit raises questions regarding workplace rights, pregnancy discrimination, and the need for accommodations, urging employers to comply with federal laws.

The lawsuit, filed in 2025, claims Amazon breached the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). According to the former employee, Amazon violated federal laws by denying her leave for an ectopic pregnancy and subsequently terminating her employment.

Behind the Amazon lawsuit

The plaintiff, a former Amazon employee, alleges that she requested leave to address an ectopic pregnancy. This is a serious medical condition where the embryo implants outside the uterus, often requiring urgent intervention.

Amazon pregnancy lawsuit ADA EEOC

According to the lawsuit against Amazon, the e-tail giant denied her request without engaging in an interactive process. This process is a critical step mandated by both the PWFA and ADA to determine reasonable accommodations.

The employee was then fired, prompting claims that Amazon violated her rights under multiple federal statutes. The FMLA, for example, guarantees eligible employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for serious health conditions, which ectopic pregnancy qualifies as.

The PWFA, enacted in 2023, requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy-related conditions, even if they are not severe, unlike the ADA’s stricter criteria. The plaintiff argues that Amazon’s failure to offer leave or discuss alternatives disregarded these legal obligations. This case is part of a broader trend, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) actively enforcing PWFA compliance, as seen in recent lawsuits against other employers.

Interplay of PWFA, ADA, and FMLA in Workplace Protections

The Amazon lawsuit highlights the overlapping protections of the PWFA, ADA, and FMLA, which collectively aim to safeguard employees facing pregnancy-related challenges. The PWFA mandates accommodations for conditions like ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, or morning sickness, broadening the scope beyond the ADA, which applies only to disabilities. For example, while pregnancy itself isn’t a disability, related conditions like ectopic pregnancy may qualify under the ADA if they substantially limit major life activities.

The FMLA complements these laws by ensuring job-protected leave, yet the plaintiff claims Amazon ignored her eligibility. This alleged oversight mirrors other cases, such as a Publix employee’s 2025 lawsuit, where termination followed a request for pregnancy-related accommodations. These incidents suggest a pattern of challenges in corporate adherence to federal mandates, particularly when employees disclose pregnancy-related needs. Employers must engage in an interactive process, as the EEOC emphasizes, to avoid liability and foster inclusive workplaces.

Implications for Employers and Employees

The Amazon lawsuit serves as a wake-up call for employers to review their accommodation policies. Failing to accommodate pregnancy-related conditions can lead to costly litigation and reputational damage. Employers should train managers on PWFA, ADA, and FMLA requirements, ensuring they understand the interactive process and the broader scope of pregnancy-related accommodations.

For employees, this case highlights the importance of knowing their rights. Workers facing pregnancy-related conditions should document requests for accommodations and any employer responses, as this can strengthen potential legal claims. The lawsuit also underscores the need for advocacy, as seen in other cases where employees successfully challenged discriminatory practices. For instance, a 2024 EEOC settlement required a Florida resort to pay $100,000 for denying leave to an employee grieving a stillbirth, reinforcing that PWFA protections extend to various pregnancy outcomes.

As the Amazon case progresses, it could set precedents for how courts interpret PWFA obligations, particularly for conditions like ectopic pregnancy. This litigation also fuels broader discussions about workplace equity, urging companies to prioritize employee well-being over operational demands. For now, the spotlight is on Amazon to address these allegations and demonstrate commitment to fair treatment, while employees nationwide watch closely, empowered to demand their rightful protections.

Subscribe to The HR Digest for the latest HR news and employment updates.          

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

Starbucks’ RTO Policy Demands In-Person Attendance 4 Days a Week

July 15, 2025 Law

DOL fines company $22K for PUMP Act violations

July 14, 2025 Law

Is geographical discrimination legal in the workplace?

July 14, 2025 Law

Target Employees Return to Office as RTO Mandates Lead the Way

July 14, 2025 Law

AI Training Gap Sparks New Digital Divide in Workplaces

July 12, 2025 Law

Indeed, Glassdoor Layoffs in 2025 See AI-Driven Cuts Take Center Stage

July 11, 2025 Law
Top Articles

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 202498 Views

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202492 Views

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 202591 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News

Staying Safe from the Latest HR and Payroll Scams in 2025

staffJuly 15, 2025

Starbucks’ RTO Policy Demands In-Person Attendance 4 Days a Week

staffJuly 15, 2025

Steering Bayer Canada’s people strategy with vulnerability and vision: Janine Pajot

staffJuly 14, 2025
Most Popular

In a shifting legal landscape, one document may save employers thousands

July 15, 20250 Views

Strategic HR, June Edition: In Canada’s knowledge economy, YOY wage growth returns, but gender gaps

July 15, 20250 Views

‘We do our best work when we’re together’: Starbucks doubles down on in-office work

July 15, 20250 Views
Our Picks

Staying Safe from the Latest HR and Payroll Scams in 2025

July 15, 2025

Starbucks’ RTO Policy Demands In-Person Attendance 4 Days a Week

July 15, 2025

Steering Bayer Canada’s people strategy with vulnerability and vision: Janine Pajot

July 14, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.