Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On

Why Specialization in Recruitment Matters Today

June 12, 2025

Looking through the lens of a business leader

June 12, 2025

Ontario offers new resource for jobseekers

June 12, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » Google doesn’t want its AI talent to join Microsoft or OpenAI — so it’s paying them to stay —
Talents

Google doesn’t want its AI talent to join Microsoft or OpenAI — so it’s paying them to stay —

staffBy staffApril 8, 20253 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

In the escalating war for top AI talent, Google is taking an unconventional approach: it’s allegedly paying some of its DeepMind employees to do nothing—for an entire year—just to stop them from defecting to rivals like Microsoft or OpenAI.

According to a report by Business Insider, DeepMind, Google’s London-based AI research lab, is enforcing what have been described as “aggressive” noncompete agreements on select employees. These contracts prevent them from joining competing AI firms for up to 12 months—effectively sidelining them from one of the fastest-moving fields in tech, while still paying them.

The report adds that while some employees are compensated during this forced hiatus, the arrangement can feel like a double-edged sword: they’re financially secure but cut off from the cutting edge of AI innovation. For researchers whose careers thrive on momentum, being removed from action for a year can be a significant setback.

This practice, while controversial, is legal in the U.K., where DeepMind is headquartered. In contrast, the United States has taken a tougher stance on noncompete clauses. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) moved last year to ban most noncompetes across the country, citing them as anti-competitive and harmful to worker mobility. However, those protections don’t apply to employees based in London.

Microsoft’s leadership has not held back in criticising the move. Last month, Mustafa Suleyman, now Vice President of AI at Microsoft and himself a DeepMind co-founder, posted on X (formerly Twitter) about the number of DeepMind staff reaching out to him in frustration over their noncompete restrictions.

“Every week one of you reaches out to me in despair to ask me how to escape your notice periods and noncompetes. Also asking me for a job because your manager has explained this is the way to get promoted, but I digress,” he wrote.

Suleyman urged DeepMind employees not to sign such agreements, calling the practice “an abuse of power.” He added, “No American corporation should have that much power, especially in Europe.”

Read the full post here. 

Despite the internal frustration, the AI arms race is only heating up. Companies like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI are locked in fierce competition to build the next generation of large language models and intelligent systems. In such an environment, retaining top AI talent is more critical—and difficult—than ever.

For Google, keeping researchers out of competitors’ hands may be a strategic priority. But as public criticism mounts and frustrated talent voices grow louder, it remains to be seen how sustainable—or ethical—this approach will be.

In the meantime, as some of the world’s most brilliant minds in AI sit idle on Google’s payroll, the broader industry is left asking: at what point does talent retention cross the line into talent suppression?

Read full story

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

Landmark Group appoints Ina Bajwa as Group Head of Talent & Engagement —

June 11, 2025 Talents

Vijay Mallya speaks on Kingfisher scam, leaders challenge his ongoing vilification —

June 6, 2025 Talents

Is he about to be cut after axing thousands? —

June 6, 2025 Talents

foundit report —

June 5, 2025 Talents

Nikesh Arora, CEO of Palo Alto Networks, appointed to Uber’s Board of Directors —

June 5, 2025 Talents

Deutsche Bank appoints Stefan Schaffer as CEO of India GCC —

June 5, 2025 Talents
Top Articles

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 202497 Views

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 202590 Views

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202490 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News

Patient-Centered Care: Does Relocation Improve Outcomes?

staffJune 12, 2025

How Canadian employers can make a four-day work week work

staffJune 11, 2025

How one recruiter manages her job without an ATS

staffJune 11, 2025
Most Popular

Why Specialization in Recruitment Matters Today

June 12, 20250 Views

Looking through the lens of a business leader

June 12, 20250 Views

Ontario offers new resource for jobseekers

June 12, 20250 Views
Our Picks

Patient-Centered Care: Does Relocation Improve Outcomes?

June 12, 2025

How Canadian employers can make a four-day work week work

June 11, 2025

How one recruiter manages her job without an ATS

June 11, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.