Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On
Board blocks union’s bid to dismiss complaint by fired worker

Board blocks union’s bid to dismiss complaint by fired worker

March 13, 2026
Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 24-year employee fired after telling workers to ‘sign off’

Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 24-year employee fired after telling workers to ‘sign off’

March 13, 2026
Employment plunges as jobless rate climbs to 6.7% in February

Employment plunges as jobless rate climbs to 6.7% in February

March 13, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » Understanding Ontario Court of Appeal’s ruling on fixed-term contracts
News

Understanding Ontario Court of Appeal’s ruling on fixed-term contracts

staffBy staffMay 14, 20241 Min Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Understanding Ontario Court of Appeal’s ruling on fixed-term contracts
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal addressed the complexities surrounding fixed-term contracts and termination clauses. In Kopyl v. Losani Homes, the court clarified that an invalid termination clause does not invalidate a fixed-term clause, reinforcing important considerations for employers. Let’s delve deeper into the key aspects of this ruling and its implications for employers in Ontario.

The case revolved around an employee hired under a one-year fixed-term contract, which included termination clauses. When the employer terminated the employee’s contract prematurely, a dispute arose regarding the validity of the termination clauses and the employee’s entitlement to compensation.

The employee contended that the termination clauses were void due to contravention of the province’s Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA). As a result, she argued that she was entitled to receive compensation for the unexpired portion of the fixed term without any duty to mitigate damages.

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

Board blocks union’s bid to dismiss complaint by fired worker

Board blocks union’s bid to dismiss complaint by fired worker

March 13, 2026 News
Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 24-year employee fired after telling workers to ‘sign off’

Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 24-year employee fired after telling workers to ‘sign off’

March 13, 2026 News
Employment plunges as jobless rate climbs to 6.7% in February

Employment plunges as jobless rate climbs to 6.7% in February

March 13, 2026 News
Shortening wrongful dismissal battles: lessons from Lee v ITW

Shortening wrongful dismissal battles: lessons from Lee v ITW

March 12, 2026 News
Whole Foods beats worker’s retaliation claim after 70-day termination

Whole Foods beats worker’s retaliation claim after 70-day termination

March 12, 2026 News
Whole Foods retaliation case: Court orders worker to pay ,500 security for costs before appeal proceeds

Whole Foods retaliation case: Court orders worker to pay $7,500 security for costs before appeal proceeds

March 12, 2026 News
Top Articles
Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded 0,000, 24 months’ notice

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 2024108 Views
5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 2025103 Views
Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202499 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News
Whole Foods retaliation case: Court orders worker to pay ,500 security for costs before appeal proceeds

Whole Foods retaliation case: Court orders worker to pay $7,500 security for costs before appeal proceeds

staffMarch 12, 2026
AI makes hiring harder, threatens expertise: survey

AI makes hiring harder, threatens expertise: survey

staffMarch 11, 2026
Women still under-represented in Canadian boardrooms: report

Women still under-represented in Canadian boardrooms: report

staffMarch 11, 2026
Most Popular
Board blocks union’s bid to dismiss complaint by fired worker

Board blocks union’s bid to dismiss complaint by fired worker

March 13, 20262 Views
Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 24-year employee fired after telling workers to ‘sign off’

Arbitrator orders reinstatement of 24-year employee fired after telling workers to ‘sign off’

March 13, 20262 Views
Employment plunges as jobless rate climbs to 6.7% in February

Employment plunges as jobless rate climbs to 6.7% in February

March 13, 20261 Views
Our Picks
Whole Foods retaliation case: Court orders worker to pay ,500 security for costs before appeal proceeds

Whole Foods retaliation case: Court orders worker to pay $7,500 security for costs before appeal proceeds

March 12, 2026
AI makes hiring harder, threatens expertise: survey

AI makes hiring harder, threatens expertise: survey

March 11, 2026
Women still under-represented in Canadian boardrooms: report

Women still under-represented in Canadian boardrooms: report

March 11, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2026 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.