Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On

Canadian employers waiving job requirements to fill roles: report

May 29, 2025

Longtime flexible, remote work arrangement ends with constructive dismissal allegation

May 29, 2025

Offering more financial benefits is critical for employees

May 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » SC Agency Loses Bid to Shield Info in Ongoing Google Lawsuit
Law

SC Agency Loses Bid to Shield Info in Ongoing Google Lawsuit

staffBy staffOctober 25, 20242 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday refused a South Carolina state agency’s lawsuit to shield information from Google that the tech giant wants to use to defend against claims that it holds an illegal monopoly over digital advertising. Chief Justice John Roberts rejected an effort by South Carolina’s parks department to block a subpoena from Google that was issued as part of a multi-state antitrust lawsuit brought against the tech giant.

South Carolina Agency Loses Bid to Shield Information in Ongoing Google Lawsuit

(Image Credit: google)

The order by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. came in an appeal by South Carolina’s state parks, recreation and tourism department, which said it was immune from Google’s subpoenas and should not immediately be required to comply with them.

Google lawsuit

The state agency and Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In the underlying lawsuit, South Carolina, Texas and 15 other states sued Google for allegedly overcharging for its advertising technology.

Google has sought information from South Carolina and other state agencies to fight the allegations. The Alphabet unit has denied the claims, which are set for a trial in federal court in Texas in March 2025.

Google legal challenges

Google as part of the lawsuit sought records from the South Carolina agency about its use of advertising products, including any “assessment of Google’s products as well as Google’s competitors.”

The parks and recreation agency is not a named plaintiff in the states’ antitrust lawsuit against Google. The agency said in objecting to the subpoenas that it was not an “arm of the state.”

Google said dozens of agencies from other states involved in the antitrust lawsuit complied with the tech company’s demands for information.

Supreme Court ruling for Google

The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in June upheld a lower judge’s order that said Google can obtain advertising-related records from the South Carolina agency.

The Supreme Court’s order means the agency must respond to Google’s demands or face being held in contempt.

Parks Department’s appeal for overturn

The South Carolina agency has separately appealed the 4th Circuit’s order, asking the justices to overturn it.

The justices could still decide to take up the South Carolina agency’s case.

The case is South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism v Google, U.S. Supreme Court, Nos. 24A325 and 24-377.

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

How AI Will Revolutionize Recruitment in the Next Six Months

May 29, 2025 Law

How AI is Transforming Talent Strategies for Future-Ready Workforces

May 29, 2025 Law

eBay TCGplayer Layoffs Announced—Accusations of Union Busting Rise

May 29, 2025 Law

Why McKinsey layoffs signal trouble in 2025

May 28, 2025 Law

Duolingo Faces Backlash Over AI Strategy, Pivots to Retract Its Statement

May 28, 2025 Law

Volvo Cars Layoffs Target 15% of Its Total Office-Based Workforce

May 27, 2025 Law
Top Articles

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 202497 Views

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 202590 Views

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202490 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News

Ontario unveils Working for Workers Seven Act to protect workes amid U.S. tariffs

staffMay 29, 2025

Ontario worker files human rights application after rejection of WSIB claim for stress

staffMay 29, 2025

How AI Will Revolutionize Recruitment in the Next Six Months

staffMay 29, 2025
Most Popular

Canadian employers waiving job requirements to fill roles: report

May 29, 20250 Views

Longtime flexible, remote work arrangement ends with constructive dismissal allegation

May 29, 20250 Views

Offering more financial benefits is critical for employees

May 29, 20250 Views
Our Picks

Ontario unveils Working for Workers Seven Act to protect workes amid U.S. tariffs

May 29, 2025

Ontario worker files human rights application after rejection of WSIB claim for stress

May 29, 2025

How AI Will Revolutionize Recruitment in the Next Six Months

May 29, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.