Close Menu
Human Resources Mag
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
What's On

Can Your Organization Spot a Conflict Before It’s a Crisis?

May 22, 2025

Divided: Report shows gaps between employee preferences, employer benefits

May 22, 2025

Worker on last-chance agreement fired for time theft, safety violation on same shift

May 22, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Human Resources Mag
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Guides
  • Law
  • Talents
  • Benfits
  • Technology
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Editor’s Picks
    • Press Release
Human Resources Mag
Home » Owner, company must pay $180,000 for discrimination based on sex, citizenship
News

Owner, company must pay $180,000 for discrimination based on sex, citizenship

staffBy staffFebruary 28, 20241 Min Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

“Employers will be held vicariously responsible for discrimination arising from the acts or omissions of their employees and/or agents, so it’s not acceptable to ignore harassment or sexual harassment claims. Employers have legal obligations to prevent sexual harassment, discrimination, and workplace bullying under the Human Rights Code and Occupational Health and Safety Act.”

So says Paulette Haynes, principal of Haynes Law Firm in Toronto, after the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal ordered an employer and its owner to pay $180,000 for the owner’s sexual harassment and sexual assault of a worker who was new to Canada.

The worker came to Canada in March 2019 as a refugee from Iran, where she had suffered several traumatic events such as forced marriage and abuse.

Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

Related Articles

Divided: Report shows gaps between employee preferences, employer benefits

May 22, 2025 News

Worker on last-chance agreement fired for time theft, safety violation on same shift

May 22, 2025 News

Collective agreement: Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd.

May 22, 2025 News

Collective agreement: The Regional Municipality of Peel

May 22, 2025 News

Employer challenges order to pay termination pay, alleging willful misconduct

May 22, 2025 News

‘Fundamental changes’: What Bill C-58 means for employers and HR

May 22, 2025 News
Top Articles

Accused of fraud, murder, fired exec awarded $500,000, 24 months’ notice

January 9, 202496 Views

Canadian Tire store under investigation for alleged exploitation of temporary foreign workers

October 2, 202490 Views

5 Best Learning Management Systems in 2025

February 11, 202588 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Latest News

Employer challenges order to pay termination pay, alleging willful misconduct

staffMay 22, 2025

Cost-Saving Benefits Of Automating HR Functions In 2025

staffMay 22, 2025

‘Fundamental changes’: What Bill C-58 means for employers and HR

staffMay 22, 2025
Most Popular

Can Your Organization Spot a Conflict Before It’s a Crisis?

May 22, 20250 Views

Divided: Report shows gaps between employee preferences, employer benefits

May 22, 20250 Views

Worker on last-chance agreement fired for time theft, safety violation on same shift

May 22, 20250 Views
Our Picks

Employer challenges order to pay termination pay, alleging willful misconduct

May 22, 2025

Cost-Saving Benefits Of Automating HR Functions In 2025

May 22, 2025

‘Fundamental changes’: What Bill C-58 means for employers and HR

May 22, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest human resources news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Human Resources Mag. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.