Human Resources MagazineHuman Resources Magazine

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest Human Resources news and updates from around the world.

    What's Hot

    Technology: the great enabler or the burdensome beast?

    June 5, 2023

    Future of Content Marketing, Will it be relevant 40 years hence?

    June 4, 2023

    Kraft Heinz’s recipe for successful internal mobility

    June 2, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Contact
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Monday, June 5
    Human Resources MagazineHuman Resources Magazine
    Demo
    • Home
    • News
    • Boardroom
    • HR Careers
    • Leadership
    • Human Capital
    • Recruitment
    • HR Software
    • Culture
    • Tech
    Human Resources MagazineHuman Resources Magazine
    Home » How should employers deal with the sharing of employees’ private images?
    Culture

    How should employers deal with the sharing of employees’ private images?

    April 5, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Employers have a legal duty to protect the health, safety and welfare of their employees, so far as is reasonable practicable.

    The question arises as to whether and to what extent an employer can take action in respect of a revenge porn allegation relating to actions that have taken place outside of the workplace.

    If the alleged perpetrator’s actions are considered to potentially threaten the reputation of the business and/or damage relationships with colleagues or the employer, this could be sufficient cause to commence an investigation and disciplinary process.


    Revenge porn: how employers can support victims

    How HR can best support victims of domestic abuse

    Whose job is it to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace?


    Employers can suspend an alleged perpetrator in order to allow for a full investigation to be carried out, provided that there is reasonable and proper cause to do so.

    Whether there is reasonable cause to suspend is likely to involve an initial investigation into the facts, but the investigation does not have to be completed or substantially completed before actioning the suspension.

    If the alleged perpetrator and victim share the same workspace, there is likely to be sufficient reason to suspend, in order to protect the wellbeing of the victim.

    If the victim isn’t in the workplace, suspension may still be appropriate if the alleged perpetrator’s presence at work could impact the wellbeing of other employees.

    Alternatively, the employer may consider that not suspending the alleged perpetrator but moving them to a different office or location would achieve the same aim of protecting the victim and other employees at work.

    While it is likely going to be necessary to suspend, this should still be considered in each individual circumstance and the reasoning for the chosen course of action appropriately documented.

    In terms of the legality of suspending, employers will need to see if there is a contractual right to suspend and should clearly inform the alleged perpetrator of the reasons for suspending. Employees should continue to receive normal pay during the period of suspension unless the contract provides that suspension can be unpaid. Employers should also aim to keep the period of suspension as short as possible.

    Providing victims with support should be paramount in light of the employer’s legal responsibilities to protect the safety of employees at work. Employers could offer support internally, or refer the victim and/or anyone else impacted to an external support organisation.

    Other ways to support the victim could include offering time off work or providing the ability to work from home while the investigation is ongoing. It is now a sexual offence under the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 to disclose a private sexual photograph or film without the consent of an individual who appears in the footage and with the intention of causing them distress.

    Employers could remind the victim of their ability to report this to the police but should not pressure them to do so.

    Stephen Moore, is partner and head of employment at Ashfords 

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Articles

    Brand design success is down to the HR function, not the marketing function

    May 31, 2023

    Non-compete clauses will have three-month limit in the UK

    May 30, 2023

    What can This Morning’s Phil and Holly feud teach HR?

    May 26, 2023

    Hot topic: Do cultural rehabilitations require a fall guy? Part one

    May 24, 2023

    Workplace culture: values matter

    May 22, 2023

    How and why to become a B Corp

    May 22, 2023
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss
    Trending

    Future of Content Marketing, Will it be relevant 40 years hence?

    By Press RoomJune 4, 2023

    In the 21st century, content creation and consumption share an incredible synergy, if not perfect.…

    Kraft Heinz’s recipe for successful internal mobility

    June 2, 2023

    The UK’s first AI employee is now for hire

    June 2, 2023

    Future leader: Lisa Drew, head of people, UK, Sigma Connected

    June 2, 2023

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest Human Resources news and updates from around the world.

    Our Picks

    Covid-19 Inquiry must examine “broken” sick pay system, says TUC

    June 1, 2023

    Canva case study: designing an international culture

    June 1, 2023

    Lessons from the C-suite: Ian Nicholas, Reed

    June 1, 2023

    Amazon offers term-time only contracts to working parents and grandparents

    May 31, 2023
    About Us
    About Us

    Human Resources Magazine is a dedicated news portal about Human Resources and all that matters to emplyees and leaders in the business section.

    Our Picks

    Technology: the great enabler or the burdensome beast?

    June 5, 2023

    Future of Content Marketing, Will it be relevant 40 years hence?

    June 4, 2023

    Kraft Heinz’s recipe for successful internal mobility

    June 2, 2023
    Trending Now

    Are the tax rules on homeworking fit for purpose?

    March 6, 2023

    From toxic to trusted: how Corinne Mills turned culture around at Alzheimer’s Society

    May 4, 2023

    Can we delete talent from the HR lexicon?

    May 23, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
    © 2023 Human Resources Magazine. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.